NEW YORK 10-13 ASSOCIATION
BROOKLYN AND STATEN ISLAND, INC.

P.O. Box 225, Fort Tilden, New York, 11695
Telephone
718 766 8871
Dedicated to serving all N.Y.P.D. Retired and Active Members for almost two decades

Home ABOUT US BOARD Meetings ACCOMPLISHMENTS 2007 REPORT PHOTOS NEWS SPONSORS EVENTS OPPORTUNITIES 10-13 Medical Unit VSF FINAL WORD

 

N EW YORK 10 - 13 ASSOCIATION

BROOKLYN AND STATEN ISLAND, INC

P.O. Box 225, Fort Tilden, New York 11695

Tel 718 766 8871  email - info@bsi1013.org

A non for profit organization of retired & active N.Y.C.P.D. Police Officers of all ranks dedicated to obtaining meaningful health & welfare & pension benefits for all retirees, widows and children.

Click to join Brooklyn_Staten_Island_1013

Click to join Brooklyn_Staten_Island_1013

 

 

Hello My name is Joseph A Guagliardo, When I was on the job. It was Joseph A Gagliardo or Joe Gag.

After retiring in 1989, there was a merge or take over all depending on who you ask. Of the NYC Police, Transit and Housing Police Departments.

In the early 90's after the merge a man named Edward Ranieri and I, embarked on what is an endless task of not only fighting for the VSF/ DEFINED  COMP for all who paid into the pension ( police ) We sought legislation. Retiree groups were split based on the retirees who were receiving the benefit and those who did not. The Unions were split this included the Corrections and FDNY on who should get it. For some reason any job after NYPD who obtained the additional pension fund did it the same as NYPD Excluding Disabled retirees, as well as pre 1968, and vested.

 

NYPD's lawsuit was brought so long after the actual VSF became law, but when the merge occurred an opening existed for Housing and Transit Retirees. and so became Gagliardo v. Dinkins and Ranieri V Dinkins et. al

 

In addition to the lawsuit we went to albany and not only sought an amendment to the bill allowing retirees discriminated against but we sought a simple "inquiry bill" this would have caused the legislature to read the law and examine if that was the intent ( excluding disabled and others excluded from the VSF.

 

Here below is the NYS Supreme Court Ruling. It is not some locker room attorneys opinion it is the States Highest Courts opinion.

If you want you can find additional citations in the Cornell University Link where this text was published after the case was heard.

 


 

 

 

You are Visitor

Hit Counter

 

 

 
 
LINKS TO WEBSITES DISCLAIMER
Any links provided on this website are provided solely for the convenience of our users. BSI1013 does not endorse, sanction, recommend or verify the accuracy of the information contained on third party websites. Concerns regarding a third party website should be directed to the third party website itself. BSI1013 bears no responsibility for any action associated with any third party website.

Copyright 2002-2009

Last Updated:  05/20/2010 14:48:47  

Designed by Joseph A. Guagliardo